Wastewater (sewage) can be analysed to reveal the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the community. Recently the UK government announced that they have successfully trialled a wastewater monitoring program which supposedly proves that SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in sewage samples. Consequently, we can be reasonably certain that everything we have been told about Covid-19 is false.
Wastewater Based Epidemiology (WBE) Used As A Predictive Tool
It has long been reported that the virus can be detected using the process of wastewater based epidemiology (WBE) and now the UK government have confirmed that it can. A UK government led program sampling wastewater in South West England has "proven" that fragments of viral genetic material can be detected in sewage.
The project is part of the National Covid-19 Wastewater Epidemiological Surveillance Program (N-WESP) which was established to examine the use of WBE for "early detection" of SARS-CoV-2 "outbreaks." N-WESP is funded by the National Environment Research Council (NERC) who are themselves directly funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI).
UKRI received just over £9bn in funding from the UK government for the 2020/21 financial year with the bulk of that funding coming from the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). BEIS are partners with the World Economic Forum (WEF) who represent the world's most powerful global corporations, including pharmaceutical giants such as AstraZeneca, GSK (via the Wellcome Trust), Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Pfizer and Sanofi etc.
The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), the Environment Agency and Joint Biosecurity Center (JBC) are collaborating on the N-WESP project to formulate "scientific intelligence" to predict "coronavirus sources."
The UK government is so confident that they have already used it to inform NHS Test and Trace. A delighted Environment Secretary George Eustice stated:
This is a significant step forward in giving us a clearer idea of infection rates both nationally and locally.
The UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock added:
This initiative is just one example of how we are working across government and with local partners to find innovative, new ways to track the outbreak ... Monitoring and sampling wastewater offers another tool to help us identify outbreaks early on-helping NHS Test and Trace and local authorities target hotspots quickly and effectively.
This fits in precisely with the objectives of the JBC: to use various lockdown measures (non pharmaceutical interventions) to rapidly respond to local "flare ups" of Covid-19. This will enable a smooth decision making process utilising a playbook of options to deliver rapid implementation and action.
We have already seen how this smooth decision making works. The UK Government smoothly issued their five Covid-19 alert levels, which later became three, and which led to the abandonment of reporting of Pillar 2 test data because it was useless. It delivered the u-turn on face masks, based upon no new scientific evidence. Smoothness produced total confusion about stay at home (or not) guidance and the UK Prime Minister was sleekly bewildered by his own policy on the mixing (or not mixing) of different households.
All of this silky smooth chaos was predicated upon the specious claim that lockdown measures work. The JBC are yet another arm of the State convinced that locking up the healthy is a sensible way to respond to a supposed viral respiratory pandemic.
A recent meta-analysis study, comparing mortality and health outcomes from more than 50 countries, found the following:
Full lockdowns and wide-spread COVID-19 testing were not associated with reductions in the number of critical cases or overall mortality.
As many have been warning for months, the detrimental impact of lockdown policies on public health in the short, medium and long term is enormous.
Surgery has been cancelled for 50,000 children in England; stroke treatment has reduced by 45%; ultrasound examinations were down by more than 65% in April and May; endoscopic examination reduced by nearly 90%; depression rates doubled; alcohol consumption increased markedly; A&E presentation halved and weekly cancer detection reduced by 58%.
It seems, none of this matters to those forcing lockdown policies upon the population. With normal winter excess mortality approaching and a staggering NHS backlog, it is not easy to see how significant additional lockdown mortality can now be avoided. Unable, or unwilling, to even consider the costs of lockdowns, the policy juggernaut rolls on.
The UK government seems to be hell-bent upon making the same "mistakes" again, causing further damage, destroying more lives, for no perceptible public health benefit. At what point do mistakes become deliberate acts?
More than 10,000 qualified scientists, 25,000 medical practitioners and half a million concerned citizens have signed the Great Barrington Declaration asking the government to rethink lockdowns. Rather than discuss the issues raised by the petition, the response was to censor it.
Once again it appears the search engine results were fixed in an attempt to remove it from the public sphere. However, in their enthusiasm to exploit WBE to justify further lockdowns, the UK government have destroyed their entire Covid-19 narrative. WBE shows the official account of how this pandemic supposedly emerged and took hold is now untenable.
Pandemics Don't Work This Way
We all know the official story of Covid-19. It is the tale which allows governments around the world to claim justifications for their draconian lockdown policies. It has provided the opportunity to reshape the entire global economy, our political systems, society and even our culture, into a new abnormal led by global leaders like Klaus Schwab and their "Great Reset" ambitions.
We are told that COVID-19 cases first emerged in China in December 2019, causing mortality within weeks. It reached U.S. shores in late January with the first death recorded on February 6th. The same was allegedly true in the UK, and dangerous community transmission had set in by early February.
Covid-19 was causing havoc in Italy in early February and Spain was besieged by mid February. New Zealand and Australia reported cases in late February, as did Brazil. From its outbreak in Wuhan, Covid-19 purportedly spread around the world in just 9 weeks, compelling the World Health Organisation to declare a global pandemic on March 11th 2020.
The approved Covid-19 story depicts a highly contagious virus which, once unleashed, escalated rapidly causing widespread mortality within weeks of infection. However, if WBE is a proven technique for accurately identifying the presence of the virus, this account simply cannot be true.
In Italy the National Institute of Health (ISS) used WBE to identify the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in samples collected on December 18th 2019 from Milan and Turin. This placed it in Italy nearly two weeks prior to the supposed outbreak of the disease in China.
Brazilian scientists used WBE to discover that the virus was present in November 2019. In Spain, the University of Barcelona reported WBE evidence of SARS-CoV-2 from samples taken in March 2019, a whole year before the WHO declared their global pandemic.
As we now know that WBE is reliable enough to inform government policy and their newly constructed bio surveillance and biosecurity systems, it seems this supposed population threatening virus had been transmitted around the world long before anyone started dying from it. It lay dormant, unnoticed by the global medical and scientific community, harming no one at all for many months.
Covid-19 didn't apparently decide to start killing people until governments reported it. It lead to virtually no significant mortality at all until the political decision was made to impose lockdown measures. Pandemics don't work this way.
When these apparent "anomalies" first emerged the usual band of approved fact checkers were quick to suggest that likely false positives explained this gaping hole in the official Covid-19 narrative. Though when it comes to large false positive rates undermining the claimed number of cases, the same fact checkers think their own arguments are a load of nonsense.
It isn't just that the virus was seemingly present long before it caused any notable harm, WBE evidence is rather inconvenient for those who seek to "blame" China for the pandemic. Yet this still doesn't account for the burgeoning contradictions appearing in the approved version of the Covid-19 story.
Governments cannot credibly maintain these inconsistencies. They have confirmed that WBE is a valid scientific process for identifying the presence of SARS-CoV-2 and have already used it to inform their own population surveillance systems. Therefore, as WBE proves it had already infected nations around the world prior to the acknowledged outbreak, the notion that Covid-19 began in Wuhan in December 2019, rapidly spread and almost immediately caused mortality, is demonstrably false.
Scientists are quick to point out that there is still much we do not know about this disease. There may be a rationale which explains how Covid-19 seemingly did nothing for months and only became "lethal" when politicians took measures to allegedly combat it. For example, Dr. Tom Jefferson from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) noted:
The explanation could only be that these agents don't come or go anywhere. They are always here, and something ignites them, maybe human density or environmental conditions, and this is what we should look for.
Perhaps so, but whatever the reason may be, the fact is that the Covid-19 story we are given to believe is wrong. It doesn't account for the WBE evidence we are being told to accept.
This is not an inconsequential error. It means that the Great Reset of humanity is based upon little more than a fiction. A fable, created out of ignorance or disinformation, which is being used by governments to enforce the complete transformation of our lives, remove our inalienable rights, and cast us as little more than bio-hazards within the new global biosecurity State.
Main image: ANDREW CURTIS (CC BY-SA 2.0)
